KESHAV RAM Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present revision petition has been filed by complainant-Keshav Ram, father of Aarti, who is stated to have died in her matrimonial home on 14.5.2011. In the FIR, the petitioner/complainant had named husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law of Aarti, besides respondent No. 2-Des Raj, maternal uncle of her husband.

(2.) The Investigating Agency found Des Raj, respondent No. 2, to be innocent and placed him in column No. 2 in the report, submitted under Section 173 Cr. P.C. The petitioner appeared before the trial Court as PW. 2 and in his deposition, he has stated the following two facts against Des Raj, respondent No. 2:-

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the above two facts, it is apparent that Des Raj had also participated in the occurrence.