SAWARN SINGH Vs. HAKAM SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PLAINTIFF Sawarn Singh has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by filling this revision petition to assail order dated 25.04.2012 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nabha thereby closing evidence of the plaintiff petitioner by Court order. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submitted that examination-in- chief of three witnesses of the plaintiff has already been recorded and cross-examination of one witness out of them has also been recorded. COUNSEL for the petitioner prayed that only one more effective opportunity be granted to the plaintiff for appearance of the remaining CR No.2865 of 2012 two witnesses (whose examination-in-chief has already been recorded) for cross-examination.

(3.) ACCORDINGLY the instant revision petition is allowed and the trial Court is directed to grant only one more effective opportunity to the plaintiff-petitioner for appearance of his remaining two witnesses (including the plaintiff himself), whose examination-in-chief has already been recorded, for their cross-examination at own responsibility, subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as cost precedent. 11th May, 2012