PARDHAN AND OTHERS Vs. MOHAR SINGH AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C.M. No. 8297-C of 2011 :

(2.) Defendants broadly denied the plaint averments. It was denied that plaintiffs are owners or in possession of the suit property. It was pleaded that plaintiffs have no right, title or interest therein. It was also alleged that the suit land is shamlat deh and is meant for common religious purposes. Door of Nohara of defendants also opens in the suit property. The plaintiffs want to grab the suit property.

(3.) Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, vide judgment and decree dated 16.03.2006, dismissed the plaintiffs' suit First appeal preferred by plaintiffs has been dismissed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, vide judgment and decree dated 16.10.2010. Vide separate order of even date, lower appellate court also dismissed application moved by plaintiffs/appellants for permission to withdraw the suit, with liberty to file fresh suit on the ground that wrong boundaries were shown in the site plan, effecting the suit. Feeling aggrieved, plaintiffs have filed the instant second appeal.