SUNIT KHURANA Vs. BAKRAMJIT SINGH AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C.' for short), has been filed by the applicant, seeking leave to file appeal against the judgement dated 28.2.2012, passed by the learned trial court, whereby respondents no.2,6,11,12 and 16 were convicted, whereas respondents no.1,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,17 and 18 were acquitted of the charges framed against them.

(2.) The criminal law was set into motion by the applicant-complainant with the allegations that the accused-respondents broke open the gate of his factory, took him forcibly out of his office and caused multiple injuries to him. However, with a view to avoid repetition and for the sake of brevity also, it would be appropriate to refer to the facts, as noticed by the learned trial court, in para 1 of the impugned judgement and the same read as under :-

(3.) The Investigating Officer carried out the investigation. After completion of the investigation, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., was presented to the learned court of competent jurisdiction. Having found that the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC was exclusively triable by the court of Sessions, the learned Illaqa Magistrate committed the case to the learned court of Sessions, for trial.