RAJ KUMAR WALIA Vs. SUBHASH CHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The contour of the facts, culminating in the commencement, relevant for the limited purpose of deciding the sole controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that Subhash Chand son of Surta Ram complainant-respondent filed the complaint (Annexure P7) against petitioner Raj Kumar Walia, Sub Inspector of Police on the following grounds:-

(2.) That being so, the complainant filed the indicated criminal complaint (Annexure P7) against the petitioner under sections 323, 325, 342 and 392 IPC. Taking cognizance on the complaint, the JMIC summoned the petitioner-accused to face trial for the commission of offences punishable under section 323, 325 and 342 IPC, by virtue of summoning orders dated 25.10.2004 (Annexure P12) and 25.10.2008 (Annexure P13).

(3.) After considering the pre-charge evidence, the trial Magistrate, by way of detailed order dated 1.7.2010 (Annexure P15) came to a definite conclusion that there is sufficient evidence on record, to frame the charges against the accused (petitioner). Consequently, the petitioner was charge sheeted accordingly, by means of charge-sheet dated 1.7.2010 (Annexure P16).