SUBHASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant application under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C.' for short), has been filed by the applicant, seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 30.3.2012.

(2.) The applicant moved an application against accusedrespondents with the allegations that his minor daughter was enticed away by the accused. However, in order to avoid repetition and also for the sake of brevity, it would be appropriate to refer to the facts noted by the learned trial Court, which read as under:-

(3.) After carrying out a detailed investigation, as noted above, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was presented to the learned court of competent jurisdiction. The relevant documents were supplied to the accused, in accordance with law. The offences punishable under Sections 366 and 376 of Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short), having been found to be exclusively triable by the court of session, the case was committed by the learned Magistrate for trial, to the court of session. However, charge was framed only against the accused-respondent Rinku for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 IPC. He pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.