REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

GRAM PANCHAYAT, MURTHAL Appellant

V/S

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KHASHABA DAJI SHINDE V. M. V. HINGE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
BURJORJEE V. SPECIAL COLLECTOR,RANGOON [REFERRED TO]
J. N. SURTY V. T. S. CHETTYAR FIRM. [REFERRED TO]
RAMANATH REDDIAR V. COMMR.,INCOME-TAX [REFERRED TO]
NAFISUD-DIN V. SECY. OF STATE [REFERRED TO]
MUHAMMAD HAYAT HAJI MUHAMMED V. COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX,PUNJAB AND N.W.F.P. [REFERRED TO]
SATRUGHAN MALL V. REVENUE COMMR.,ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN LAL HARDEO DAS V. COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX,BIHAR AND ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. QAISAR JEHAN BEIGUN [REFERRED TO]
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS CAL CUTTA VS. BEST AND CO [REFERRED TO]
RAM SINGH VS. PANCHAYATI ADALAT [REFERRED TO]
GOPALDAS SARVADAYAL VS. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX U P [REFERRED TO]
JANKIBAI TUKARAM VS. NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST NAGPUR [REFERRED TO]
HARI KRISHAN KHOSLA VS. STATE OF PEPSU [REFERRED TO]
KASHI PARSHAD VS. NOTIFIED AREA [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY OF STATE VS. KARIM BUX [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE question that has been referred by my Lord, the Chief Justice, for our decision is in the following terms :-

(2.) IT was contended by Mr. Anand Saroop, learned counsel, that the petitioner was entitled to claim exclusion of time taken for obtaining the copy of the award. Reliance in support of his contention was placed on the two provisions of the indian Limitation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Limitation Act), viz. , subsection (2) of S. 12 and S. 29, in addition to the judicial pronouncements of different High Courts. On the other hand it was contended by Mr. Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent that the scope of sub-section (2) of S. 12 of the limitation Act was limited and that Section 29 could not in turn extend or enlarge its scope so as to include even an application of reference to be made under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

(3.) AFTER giving my thoughtful consideration to the entire matter, I find myself unable to agree with the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner. The relevant provisions of the Limitation Act are in the following terms :-

Click here to view full judgment.

GRAM PANCHAYAT MURTHAL Vs. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address