RAJ RANI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS in a plaintiff's appeal against an appellate decree passed by the 2nd Additional District judge of Delhi, confirming the decree passed by the trial Court.

(2.) RAJ Rani plaintiff claims to be the owner of the premises in suit. On the 14th of April 1949, a notice was given under Section 3 (3) of the Delhi Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Act XLIX of 1947. This notice was addressed to Sham Lal who is the husband of Raj Rani and was accepted by him as indeed it had to be. A copy of the notice was also affixed on the premises and notice was also served on the tenants. The notice was in the following terms:

(3.) OBJECTIONS were raised to the notice of requisition by the tenants and on the 27th of April 1949, the Collector passed the following order :