REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Nishant Dutta Appellant

V/S

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

DR. MUNEEB UL REHMAN HAROON AND ORS. VS. GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
KANPUR UNIVERSITY VS. SAMIR GUPTA:SAMIR GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION ALPANA V MEHTA VS. PARITOSH BHUPESHKUMAR SHETH:MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. CHIRMAN BIHAR SERVICE COMMISSION PATNA [REFERRED TO]
PRESIDENT BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. D SUVANKAR [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY WEST BENGAL COUNCIL OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. AYAN DAS [REFERRED TO]
SAHITI VS. CHANCELLOR DR N T R UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO]
H P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. MUKESH THAKUR [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY ALL INDIA PRE MEDICAL VS. KHUSHBOO SHRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION VS. PRAVAS RANJAN PANDA [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR KUKREJA VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH [REFERRED TO]
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
RAN VIJAY SINGH & ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. [REFERRED TO]
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA THR REGISTRAR GENERAL VS. TIRTHA SARATHI MUKHERJEE & ORS [REFERRED TO]
MAHIPAL SINGH AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
HARVINDER SINGH JOHAL VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL [REFERRED TO]
PRANAV VERMA VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner- Nishant Dutta, who had applied under the General Category for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate in the Punjab Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Examination-2019 (hereinafter referred to as 'PCS-JB') in pursuance to the advertisement dated 05.04.2019, has filed the present petition seeking writ in the nature of Mandamus for correcting the alleged mistakes committee by the paper checker while evaluating English Language Answer Sheet (Annexure P-7) in particular Questions No. 4(1), 4(5), 5(1), 5(5) and 5(6).

(2.) The exam was scheduled to be held in three parts starting with preliminary examination followed by the main written examination and thereafter the viva voce. A specific clause No. 11 was mentioned in the advertisement as per which re-evaluation of answer sheets is not permissible and only re-checking is permissible.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised the following arguments:-

Click here to view full judgment.

NISHANT DUTTA Vs. PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address