LAWS(P&H)-2021-1-95

DILSHAD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On January 19, 2021
DILSHAD Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Through this writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure P4) rejecting the application for appointment as Constable in Haryana Police after he was selected. At the outset, it must be noticed that the petitioner applied on 24.09.2015 pursuant to recruitment notice published on 19.07.2015. The petitioner was recommended to be appointed, however, on verification of his character and antecedents, it was found that the petitioner was involved in FIR No. 329 dated 12.04.2012, registered under Section 419 and 420 IPC at Police Station Chandani Bagh, District Panipat. Thus, the competent authority has passed a detailed order on 20.09.2019 correctness whereof has been challenged in the writ petition.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that since the petitioner has been acquitted in the criminal case vide judgment dated 09.12.2015, therefore, he is entitled to appointment in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench in The State of Haryana and Others v. Pawan Kumar (Letters Patent Appeal No. 1059 of 2015, decided on 26.05.2016).

(3.) On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent/State has submitted that the petitioner, while filing the application, suppressed the material information. He drew attention of the Court to a copy of application on 24.09.2015 (Annexure R1). He submitted that the petitioner did not make correct disclosure and rather submitted false information. He further submitted that in view of the judgment passed by a Larger Bench of the Supreme Court in Avtar Singh v. Union of India and Others , 2016 8 SCC 471, the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court cannot be relied upon. He further drew attention of the court to the amendment brought in, by the State of Haryana in Rule 12.18 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (as applicable to the State of Haryana), requiring the candidates to make a disclosure failing which non-disclosure would lead to outright disqualification.