REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JIYA LAL Appellant

V/S

RAJ KUMAR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JAI SINGH VERSUS MUGHLA AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
AJMER SINGH VERSUS DHARAM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
GURDIAL SINGH AND OTHERS VS. MAM CHAND [REFERRED TO]
RAM NIWAS VS. KALU RAM AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
ROSHAN LAL AND OTHERS VS. SADHU AND ANOTHER. [REFERRED TO]
ATAM PRAKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
BABU VERGHESE VS. BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM SUNDER VS. RAM KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
POKHAR VS. RAM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
JAI SINGH VS. GURMEJ SINGH [REFERRED TO]
RATI RAM VS. MAM CHAND [REFERRED TO]
PANKAJAKSHI (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. & OTHERS VS. CHANDRIKA & OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
BHARTU VS. RAM SARUP [REFERRED TO]
RANDHIR KAUR VS. PRITHVI PAL SINGH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Controversy in the present case relates to right of pre-emption of a co-sharer in terms of Section - 15 (I)(b), Clause 'Fourth' of The Punjab Pre-emption Act ,1913 (as applicable to State of Haryana) for short "the Act" and the part of the text existing at the relevant point of time, reads as under:-

(2.) Subject matter of the lis is agricultural land measuring 35 Kanals, 2 Marlas, hereinafter referred as "suit land"; which was purchased by appellants-vendees (defendants No. 1 to 5) from defendants No. 6 to 12 (Vendors), vide registered sale deed dated 14.06.1986. Respondent-sole Plaintiff (now deceased), claiming himself to be a co-sharer in the 'Khewat' comprising suit land, filed suit for pre-emption , which was decreed by both the courts below. Unsuccessful appellants are in second appeal under section 41 of The Punjab Courts Act, 1918; for short "the Punjab Courts Act".

(3.) Suit was filed by respondent on the premise that:-

Click here to view full judgment.

JIYA LAL Vs. RAJ KUMAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address