ANITA AND ORS. Vs. ANIL KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD .

(2.) THE Petitioners, Anital, Sheela, M.B. Mehtab and Ashok, who have been arrayed as accused in Criminal Complaint No. 58 dated 3.2.2010 titled as Anil Kumar v. Anita and Ors. under Sections 323, 379, 392, 427, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, pending in the Court of JMIC, Amritsar, have filed this petition under Section 407 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the transfer of the same to some Court of competent jurisdiction at Jalandhar.

(3.) IN the reply filed by the Respondent, he controverted the allegations levelled against him. He pleaded therein that the FIR, so lodged by Petitioner No. 1, is false and was registered by the police under the influence of the Petitioners. Petitioner No. 1 was running a beauty parlour before her marriage in the house of her parents and even after the marriage, she left the matrimonial home and started that business. An ex parte maintenance order was obtained by her and he being a junior Advocate is not in a position to pay that maintenance allowance to her. She is already appearing in the Court at Amritsar through her counsel Sh. Mandeep Arora, Advocate. He prayed for the dismissal of the petition.