RAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 224 dated 25.12.2010 under Sections 307/323/34 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act, P.S. Division No. 8, Jalandhar.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that fire arm injury is on the leg of the injured. He further argued that Petitioner is in judicial custody w.e.f. 25.12.2010 and till date no prosecution witness has been examined, although prosecution has cited 15 witnesses. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has relied on the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court in the matter of State of Kerala v. Raneef, 2011 (1) RCR (Cri) 381, and argued that in the event of refusal of bail, time spent in the jail cannot be restored to the accused, if ultimately the accused is acquitted by the trial Court.