ROOPA DEVI ALIAS ROOPA BAI Vs. URMIL RANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for setting aside order dated 15.11.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge(Junior Division), Panipat vide which evidence of petitioner was closed.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court.

(3.) IT has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the only witness remains to be examined in this case is official from the office of Deputy Director(OSB), Delhi Development Authority and that he already appeared before learned trial Court and his examination-in-chief was conducted. Record was also brought by him. However, his crossexamination was deferred at the request of learned counsel for the defendants. IT has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that now the case is fixed for 11.03.2011 and on that day he will be examined and petitioner-plaintiff does not want to examine any other witness. These facts have not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents-defendants.