SHASHI KANT KAUSHAL Vs. BEENA KAUSHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appeal is against the order dismissing the petition for divorce on the ground that the wife was suffering from mental illness and that she was also guilty of cruelty. THE facts as disclosed in the petition were that through the marriage the couple had been blessed with two daughters, namely, Puja who was 6 years of age and Pragya who was 4 years of age at the time when the petition was presented in the year 1990. It was contended by the petitioner that the respondent has suffered from Paranoid Schizophrenia and had been taking treatment from the Department of Psychiatry in PGI, Chandigarh and that had not been disclosed to him before marriage that she was suffering from such mental disorder and was taking treatment. It is also alleged in the petition that the respondent did not like to live with the petitioner in the company of his parents and at her insistence, he left his father and unmarried sister at Mohali and shifted to a rented house in Sector 16, Panchkula. THE respondent was working as a Teacher in Paragon Public School, Mohali. THE grouse of the petitioner was that she had been keeping her earnings to herself and she never allowed the petitioner to spend any money out of her earnings for household expenses. THE suggestion was, therefore, the respondent had been guilty of cruelty on that account also. As a further instance of cruelty, the husband would urge that she denied sexual access to him.

(2.) THE wife denied that she was suffering from any mental illness. She would contend that the petitioner himself had deliberately instigated the co-tenant Bhupinder Singh Saini and his wife to assault and misbehave with her to create evidence against her. She would contend that the petitioner had instigated one Chaman Lal and his associates and through them threats had been issued to her that she would be forcibly thrown out of the residential house. She denied that the petitioner had shifted to a rented house at her insistence. She further stated that the father-in-law was an Army pensioner and he had his own house. He had also married his daughter. THE petitioner chose to take a rental accommodation only to claim appropriate allowances from his employer.

(3.) ALL the instances of cruelty which had been provided to the wife had been properly explained by the wife. I do not find any of the instances had been clearly established. On the other hand, it was the evidence by the wife that she had been subjected to harassment and the petitioner had been making attempts to eject her from the house on some pretext or the other.