JASWANT SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) It is not in dispute that the documents placed on record along with the review application, were not before the Writ court at the point in time when the writ petition was heard.

(2.) Learned counsel further has not been able to dispute that the legal aspect sought to be argued at this stage, was not argued when arguments in writ petition were heard.

(3.) A Division Bench of this Court, while dealing with 2005(4) S.C.T. 40 : Review Application No. 174 of 2005 in CWP 17259 of 2004 (Mohinder Pal Bali v. Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others), decided on 5.8.2005, in regard to the scope of interference in review application, has held in the following terms :-