SADHNA Vs. BALDEV KRISHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By way of instant revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of eviction dated 5.4.2001 of Rent Controller, Panchkula and judgment dated 3.8.2011 of the Appellate Authority, Panchkula, dismissing the appeal against the aforesaid order of eviction.

(2.) The respondent-landlords filed ejectment petition against the petitioner- tenant alleging that the present petitioner was tenant in the demised premises @ Rs. 6,000/- per month besides electricity and water charges. She has not paid the rent w.e.f. 1.4.2002 to 31.12.2006 and that the premises in question were bonafidely required by the respondent/landlords for their personal use and occupation.

(3.) The grounds of eviction as set up by the respondent/landlords reads thus :-