LAWS(P&H)-2011-2-300

BAHADUR SINGH Vs. HARPREET SINGH

Decided On February 10, 2011
BAHADUR SINGH Appellant
V/S
HARPREET SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PLAINTIFF had filed a suit for recovery placing reliance on pronote and receipt. Vide the impugned order dated 29.1.2011, the evidence of the Defendant has been closed. Hence the present petition.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that on 29.1.2011, the cross examination of DWV.B. Bhatnagar was concluded. The Petitioner also tendered his affidavit. However, the same was not accepted in evidence by the trial court.

(3.) ON 11.11.2010, replication to the amended written statement was filed. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff made the statement that the Plaintiff did not want to lead any further evidence and the case was adjourned for Defendant evidence. On the adjourned date i.e. 14.12.2010, DW V.B. Bhatnagar was present and tendered his affidavit. Cross examination of the said witness was deferred at the request of the counsel for the Plaintiff. On 14.1.2011, the witness was present but his cross examination was deferred at the request of the counsel for the Defendant. On 29.1.2011, the cross examination of DW -V.B. Bhatnagar was concluded. Counsel for Defendant placed on record affidavit of Bahadur Singh as a witness.