LAJPAT RAI CHANANA Vs. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Learned counsel for the appellant has referred to claim no.4 of the Arbitration Award and has submitted that no detailed reasons have been given by the Arbitrator despite the fact that at the time of remanding the case, it was specifically directed to the arbitrator to give the detailed reasons.

(2.) Perusal of the award passed by the arbitrator shows that complete reasoning has been given while deciding the claim no.4, which reads as under:-

(3.) Otherwise also perusal of the award shows that it has been passed by giving detailed reasons. Once the award has been passed within four corners of law, mathematical scrutiny of every action of the arbitrator cannot be permitted in this appeal. Dismissed.