MUSHTAK Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application moved by the Petitioner under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 11 dated 22.1.2010 under Sections 279/336 IPC read with Sections 3/8, 4A/8 of Punjab Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 2/80 of Animal Cruelty Act, P.S. DLF, Phase II, Gurgaon.

(2.) FIR in the present case, reads as under:

(3.) LEARNED Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has argued that there was dispute between the Petitioner - accused and Ali Mohd pursuant to the vehicle in question and the Petitioner -accused had taken back the vehicle in question from the possession of Ali Mohd in whose favour it was directed to be released by the Court on superdari. However, fact remains that nothing is to be recovered from the Petitioner.