NARENDER SINGH Vs. ANITA RANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order dated 20.11.2010, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa, vide which on an application filed by Respondent -wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act') for maintenance pendente lite, she was allowed maintenance pendente lite @ Rs. 3000/ -per month.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa.

(3.) IT has been contended by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that there is no proof regarding income of the Petitioner and that in fact he is earning only Rs. 3000/ -per month and hence maintenance pendente lite @ Rs.3000/ -per month as allowed by learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa, is on the higher side. It has also been contended that Respondent -wife is an educated lady and she can earn for herself.