GAURI CHANANA Vs. RAJIV CHANANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 17.1.2011, Annexure P15, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Panchkula, vide which evidence of petitioner has been closed.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Additional District Judge.

(3.) THE fact that applications, Annexures P9 and P10 are pending has not been disputed by counsel for the respondent. He has also stated that he has already filed reply to the said applications on 17.1.2011. However, the same were not decided by learned trial Court before passing the impugned order closing evidence of the petitioner. It has further been contended that respondent is having no objection if petitioner is granted liberty to lead evidence by setting aside the impugned order and, however, as the main petition is pending since the year 2007, learned trial Court be directed to dispose of the same in a time bound manner.