BALWAN SINGH Vs. SMT. ANITA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CM Nos.29135-36-CII of 2011:

(2.) Shorn of unnecessary details, it is suffice to say that eviction of the petitioner has been ordered from the demised premises on the ground that the shop in dispute has become unfit and unsafe for human habitation. The said ground, as set up in the ejectment application, reads thus:-

(3.) The petitioner controverted the aforesaid ground stating that the demised shop is in perfectly good condition and there is no danger of its collapse. Other averments in the ejectment petition were also controverted and dismissal of the ejectment petition was sought.