LAWS(P&H)-2011-4-218

SURJAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On April 21, 2011
SURJAN SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SURJAN Singh - Petitioner has applied for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 109 dated 16.6.2010 under Section 304 -B IPC, registered at Police Station Chheharta, Amritsar.

(2.) AS per allegation of the prosecution, the law was set in motion by recording the statement of Ram Singh, father of Kulwinder Kaur, who has stated that Kulwinder Kaur was married with Sukhcharan Singh s/o Surjan Singh. After marriage her husband Sukhcharan Singh, mother -in -law Satwinder Kaur, father -in -law Surjan Singh and Nanad (sister -in -law) Harjinder Kaur were harassing her for bringing more dowry. Husband of daughter of the complainant was working in Dubai, who had returned 18 days back and Kulwinder Kaur was harassed a lot for bringing more dowry. He has further stated that he came to know that Sukhcharan Singh, mother -in -law Satwinder Kaur, father -in -law Surjan Singh and Nanad (sister -in -law) Harjinder Kaur have killed his daughter Kulwinder Kaur, by poisoning her.

(3.) LEARNED State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurminder Singh, is fair enough to concede that material witnesses namely, Ram Singh, Desa Singh and Joginder Singh, have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution.