PAYEL MEHTA Vs. SANJAY SARIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE epitome of the facts, which needs a necessary mention for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant revision petition and emanating from the record, is that Payel Mehta petitioner -wife filed a petition against Sanjay Sarin her husband -respondent, for dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce, invoking the provisions of section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act") at Chandigarh. Her husband has also filed a petition under section 9 of the Act against her in the Court of Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

(2.) IN the wake of transfer petitions filed by the petitioner -wife, the Hon'ble Apex Court transferred the HMA case pending in Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to the District Court, Chandigarh for trial alongwith the divorce petition, by virtue of order dated 15.11.2010, the operative part of which is (para 3) as under:

(3.) AFTER hearing the petitioner in person, going through the record, comments of the trial Court and after deep consideration over the entire matter, to my mind, the instant revision petition deserves to be partly accepted.