DEV RAJ Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE of motion.

(2.) MR .J.S. Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents.

(3.) THE Petitioner was working as a Beldar on work -charge basis with Respondent No. 3, namely, the Executive Engineer, Warehousing Division, Ranjit Sagar Dam Project, Shahpur Kandi Township, Pathankot, and has retired w.e.f. 31.12.2004 on attaining the age of superannuation. He seeks quashing of the order vide which the retrenched increments given to the Petitioner have been withdrawn and a recovery of Rs. 35,973/ -has been sought to be effected from him.