RAM PAL Vs. DEEPAK SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This a revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in which two directions have been sought; i) to direct the Rent Controller to decide the application filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short "CPC"] for restoration and the application for bringing on record the legal representatives within a specified time and ii) to direct the Rent Controller to record the exact proceedings in zimni orders as they take place in the Court.

(2.) The Petitioner has alleged that his father had filed eviction petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [for short "the Act"] against the Respondent on the grounds of non-payment of rent since November 2006 for his own and the use and occupation of his son. During the pendency of the eviction petition, father of the Petitioner expired on 24.09.2007 leaving behind his wife and his two sons including the Petitioner. The Petitioner filed an application to the Rent Controller on 27.11.2007 in order to bring them on record as legal representatives of his father. In this regard, the following zimni order was passed on 05.10.2007 by the Rent Controller:

(3.) On 17.07.2008, reply to the application for brining on record the legal representatives was filed and the case was adjourned to 11.09.2008 for consideration of the application. On 11.09.2008, the following order was passed by the Rent Controller: