ATTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, dated 13.2.2008 vide which Respondent No. 2 was acquitted of the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

(2.) FEELING aggrieved by the said judgment, the complainant/Petitioner has approached this Court for setting aside the impugned judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, and to convict the accused for an offence under Section 302 IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act.

(3.) THE accused was chargesheeted for committing an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution in support of its case has examined as many as 16 witnesses. Thereafter, statement of the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded, in which he denied all the allegations of the prosecution and pleaded false implication. However, he did not choose to lead any defence evidence.