JARNAIL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER is a complainant. He had filed an application that the respondents/ accused had committed house trespass with an objective to commit offence which is punishable for "life". It is claimed that the accused had caused serious head injuries on the complainant -petitioner and his brother Girdhari Lal with an intention to cause their death, therefore, offence under Section 450 IPC was required to be mentioned in the FIR. It is claimed that the respondents are liable to be tried and convicted for offence under Section 450 IPC. An application for framing charges under Section 450 IPC has been dismissed, inter -alia on the ground that the injury on the person of complainant has been declared to be simple.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submits that, no doubt the injury has been declared simple by the Doctor but in this context the matter was complained to the higher authorities by the petitioner for favoring the accused -respondents and diluting the gravity of the part attributed to accused -respondents.

(3.) DISPOSED of with the said observation.