SMT. KRISHNA DEVI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the Petitioner.

(2.) THE Petitioner seeks pre -arrest bail in a case registered against her on 08.04.2010 for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 201 and 120B IPC at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala.

(3.) IN order to elicit information and material regarding the impersonation by the Petitioner and others, the custodial interrogation of the Petitioner would be necessary. Besides, it is to be kept in view that in a case of pre -arrest bail, the advantage of custodial interrogation for eliciting more information and material is to be kept in view. The exercise of power to grant pre -arrest bail is somewhat extraordinary in nature. Keeping in view the allegations as made in the case, no ground for grant of concession of pre -arrest bail to the Petitioner is made out.