SAVITA BAINS Vs. AKASHDEEP AND ANR.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 2.2.2011, Annexure P1, passed by learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar, vide which defence of Petitioner -Respondent No. 1 has been struck off with a further prayer to grant one opportunity to the Petitioner to place on record the written statement.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Rent Controller. Brief facts relevant for the decision of present revision petition are that ejectment petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act for ejectment of present Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 from the premises in dispute was filed by Respondent No. 1 -landlord. Present Petitioner on receiving notice appeared on 28.7.2010, as is clear from the zimni orders, reproduced by the Petitioner in this petition. Case was adjourned to 1.9.2010. However, as the Presiding Officer was on leave on 1.9.2010 and 2.9.2010 was declared as holiday, the case was adjourned to 27.10.2010, when an application was filed on behalf of the present Petitioner directing the Respondent -landlord to produce original rent agreement, as there was dispute regarding quantum of rent. Case was adjourned to 14.12.2010 for filing reply to that application and consideration. On 14.12.2010, reply was not filed and case was adjourned to 2.2.2011 for filing reply and consideration. The said order reads as under:

(3.) IT has been contended that on 2.2.2011 as well, reply to the application was not filed, nor rent note was placed on record and however, without considering the said fact, learned Rent Controller passed the following order striking off the defence of present Petitioner, which reads as under: