HARI OM Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) APPLICATION is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.16, dated 29.1.2010, under Section 395 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal, vide which application filed by petitioner for grant of regular bail has been dismissed.

(3.) IT has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and that he has been continuing in custody since 29.1.2010, i.e., from the date of occurrence and that trial is not likely to conclude in near future as only one witness has been examined so far. Allegations against the petitioner-accused are very serious in nature. Main witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, he is not entitled for bail, at this stage.