SANDEEP RANA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

(2.) THE Petitioner seeks pre -arrest bail in the cross -cross registered vide DDR No. 23 dated 17.12.2010 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 148 and 149; besides, Sections 325 and 308 IPC which were added later.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated on account of the fact that his mother Sikandra Rani has lodged a FIR against the complainant side. It may, however, be noticed that the injuries attributed to the Petitioner are with the club on the head of Sher Singh. The said injuries have been declared dangerous to life and grievous in nature. This has been so observed in the order dated 28.12.2010 (Annexure -P.8) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar while declining bail to the Petitioner and Sanjiv Kumar. Keeping in view the nature of injuries which are opined to be dangerous to life and grievous in nature; besides, being on the head, no ground for grant of pre -arrest bail is made out.