SANJEEV KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered against him on 23.9.2010 for the offences under Sections 420 and 506 IPC.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the proceedings in the trial of the case have been stayed in respect of the son of the Petitioner. It is submitted that the complainant has already filed a civil suit seeking specific performance of the agreement to sell against the Petitioner and his wife which is pending. The Petitioner was earlier granted interim bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad. However, due to ill -health, the Petitioner could not surrender within stipulated time. Thereafter, he has been arrested. The wife of the Petitioner, it is submitted, has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 19.1.2011 (Annexure P3).