MUSTAK KHILJEE Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE Petitioner seeks pre -arrest bail in a case registered against him on 18.11.2008 for the offence under Section 379 IPC at Police Station DLF, Sector 29, Gurgaon.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that the Petitioner is not involved in the case and he is sought to be falsely implicated. It is submitted that Naresh Kumar @ Kallu has wrongly named the Petitioner as he (Naresh Kumar @ Kallu) is not on good terms with the family of the Petitioner and was nursing a grudge against them. As regards the vehicle, it is submitted, that has already been recovered; besides, the petitioner is ready to join the investigation.