KRISHAN KUMAR Vs. TEJENDER SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COMPLAINANT-petitioner has moved present petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused Rejender Singh son of Ram Singh and Ram Singh son of Har Narain vide order dated 08.02.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner states that bail was obtained by both the accused by playing fraud on the Court stating wrong facts that injured has been discharged from the hospital while in fact, injured is still in a semi conscious stage and is still in hospital. Second ground taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner for cancellation of bail is that learned counsel for the accused failed to produce the other co-accused before the Court despite of undertaking being furnished by him at the time of arguing the bail application of Tejender Singh and Ram Singh.

(3.) I have carefully perused the bail order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge. Learned Additional Sessions Judge has not observed anywhere that bail is being granted on the ground that injured has already been discharged from the hospital. Therefore, in my considered view, first argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner does not hold water.