DESHPAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE Petitioner seeks pre -arrest bail in a case registered against him on 24.1.2011 for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 341 and 506 IPC.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the Petitioner is not attributed the injury for the offence under Section 307 IPC which is attracted on account of the injury received by one Partap. Besides, it is submitted that the Petitioner has been implicated due to party faction as previously the father of the complainant contested the election of MLA, but the Petitioner was supporter of the opposite candidate. The father of the complainant lost the election and since then, the complainant side is having a grudge against the Petitioner. It is submitted that there is also a delay of one day in registration of FIR.