(1.) PETITIONERS were found guilty for offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 326 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/ -each under Section 148 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month. They were further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/ -each under Sections 323/149 IPC and in default of payment of fine, Petitioners were further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. The Petitioners were further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/ -each under Sections 326/149 IPC and in default of payment of fine, Petitioners were further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hisar. However, in appeal learned Sessions Judge has directed as under:
(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioners states that he is not pressing this revision on merit and is not challenging the conviction of the accused under Sections 148/149/323/326 IPC. Learned Counsel for the revisionists further submits that revisionists should be released on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
(3.) MS . Preeti Chaudhari, AAG, Haryana, states that Petitioners/revisionists are the first time offenders and no other criminal case is pending against them.