ZILE SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioners have filed this petition seeking quashing of order dated 23.2.2006 whereby charge was ordered to be framed against them.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the trial Court had ordered framing of the charge against the petitioners only on the basis of report of a handwriting expert. There was no other evidence on record to make out a case for proceeding against the petitioners.

(3.) Learned State counsel as well as the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, on the other hand, have submitted that in the civil proceedings, the Will set up by the petitioners was disbelieved and the Will in question was a forged document. The petitioners had lost up to the Apex Court in the civil litigation.