VICKY Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ACCUSED Vicky has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 60 dated 24.07.2011, under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Dera Baba Nanak, District Batala.

(2.) I have heard Learned Counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

(3.) THE prosecutrix, in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before Magistrate, stated that under threat by petitioner's co -accused Bhupinder Singh, she had given him Rs. 1,35,000/ - on the night between 20/21.07.2011. When she came out of her house on 21.07.2011, she was forcibly put in a car by Bhupinder Singh. There were three other persons (including the present petitioner referred to as doctor) in the said car. She was forcibly taken away. Bhupinder Singh also raped her. He also contracted marriage with her in Gurudwara without her consent. Counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that the prosecutrix voluntarily lived with Bhupinder Singh for 15 days and contracted marriage with him in Gurudwara, which was performed on 21.07.2011 and both of them also filed protection petition before Punjab Human Rights Commission. It was also vehemently contended that version given in the FIR has been materially changed subsequently by the prosecution. It was also contended that the prosecutrix, as per her own affidavit, was major.