TARSEM LAL Vs. SMT. HARJINDER KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON the last date of hearing, this revision petition was dismissed on merits. However, notice was issued to the respondent/landlady and stay was granted only on the ground that the petitioner is ready to pay the prevailing market rent to the respondent/landlady. Today, the landlady Harjinder Kaur, who is present in the Court, states that she does not want increase in the rent, rather she want possession of the demised premises.

(2.) FACED with the aforesaid circumstance, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some reasonable time to vacate the demised premises, to which the landlady has not shown any averseness.