SHIVAM TELENET PVT. LTD Vs. SURESH KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned judgment dated 19.7.2011 of the Rent Controller, U.T., Chandigarh, whereby his application for permitting him to lead additional evidence was rejected.

(2.) THE respondent-landlord filed an eviction petition against the petitioner on the ground of personal necessity. The petitioner contested the same taking a specific stand that the landlord does not need the property in dispute for his personal necessity and in fact he is getting the premises vacated to sell the same.

(3.) EVEN the details of the evidence sought to be led has not been mentioned in the application for leading additional evidence. It could not be disputed that the case is at the fag end and in fact fixed for arguments. No doubt the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are hand made for administration of justice, however, the same also cannot be used to promote the abuse of process of law. No justification has been shown to allow the petitioner to lead additional evidence in the instant case.