VIJAY PAL Vs. DAYA RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE evidence of the petitioner was closed by order on July 29. 1998. Hence, (his revision petition.

(2.) THE plaintiff -respondent filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement. The suit having been contested by the defendant, the parties went on trial. The defendant, now petitioner, had produced some evidence. His remaining evidence was closed by order which is under challenge.

(3.) THE impugned order, for facility of reference is reproduced as under: -