SADHU SINGH Vs. BHAJAN SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant revision petition is preferred against orders of Commissioner, Jalandhar (30.6.1997) and Collector, Sub-Division, Jalandhar (4.2.1993) in a petition case.

(2.) HISTORY of this case has been recorded in the order of Commissioner, Jalandhar which may be read as a part of this order.

(3.) CONTROVERTING the above arguments Sh. G.S. Gandhi, Advocate who represented the respondents No. 1 and 3 stated that question of title was involved in this case which should have been decided as a civil Court after following the procedure prescribed in the CPC. Order of 30.1.1992 suffers from serious legal infirmities and is, therefore, bad in law. The question of title must have been decided properly before proceeding further with the partition case. Since AC-1 has omitted to do so, his order was rightly set aside by the Collector, Jalandhar. The respondents are the bona fide purchasers for consideration and deserve protection. He urged dismissal of revision petition and for upholding of the order of Commissioner and Collector.