(1.) BY this writ petition the employer is challenging the award of the Labour Court dated 20.10.1997, copy Annexure P. 10. The award was, as a result of a reference made by respondent No. 2, in connection with the withdrawal of compensatory allowance given to the hilly and Bet areas by the petitioner. The Labour Court held in favour of the respondents that they are entitled to the allowance in terms of resolution dated 4.1.1990 and that the order passed on 15.1.1990 unilaterally withdrawing the same from the employees of the petitioners without following the provisions of Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act and the Rules framed thereunder, was illegal and inoperative. The petitioners had granted the benefit after the Punjab Government granted this benefit to its employees. Subsequently, the Punjab Government withdraw this allowance and consequently, the petitioners also withdrew it. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that because the Punjab Government had given the benefit, the petitioners also gave the benefit to their workmen and after it was withdrawn by the Punjab Government, the same was withdrawn by the petitioners also. He also argued that if the petitioners can grant the benefit, they could also withdraw it.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents had relied on Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act. In this respect the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners was that this is the change in the condition of service as envisaged under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act as mentioned in the fourth Schedule to the Act. Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act reads as under : -
(3.) PETITION dismissed.