GOPAL KRISHAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WRITTEN statement does not appear to be on the record of this case. Counsel for the respondents states that the written statement has been filed. Counsel for the petitioners also states that a copy of the same was given to the petitioners. Counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the written statement which she was having. Counsel for the petitioners has no objection if the same is taken on record as written statement. So ordered.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners were appointed on adhoc basis on 19.1.1987, 27.1.1987 and 24.1.1987 respectively. Vide order annexure P/3 dated 18.4.1988 their services were terminated. The text of the order is reproduced for ready reference. It is as under : "On the above mentioned subject your attention is attracted and you are informed that the Department has no need of your services. You are hereby terminated with immediate effect." 4. This is an order simplicitor. Counsel for the petitioners argued :