BABU LAL Vs. NARESH GULATI, I.A.S.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their assistance, have gone through the record of the case.

(2.) SOME facts can be noticed in the following manner for the purpose of disposal of the present C.M. No. 4106 -CII of 2000.

(3.) THROUGH this application the grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that respondent No. 3 did not allow the applicant to join duty as a washing boy on the ground that respondent No. 3 called upon the applicant to deposit benefits of gratuity, leave encashment etc. which were withdrawn from the applicant. Counsel submitted that the applicant was called upon to deposit a sum of Rs. 25,004/ - by way of compensation; benefit of leave encashment Rs. 42,120/ -; benefit of G.I.S. Rs. 4,678/ -; a sum of Rs. 1,19,796/ - received by the applicant by way of G.P.P.; Rs. 84,365/ - by way of gratuity, besides the benefit of pension, plus medical allowances etc. The counsel submitted that it was not the import of the order passed by Hon'ble V.S. Aggarwal, J. Since respondent No. 3 had not allowed the applicant to join duty in pursuance of the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench, therefore, directions should be given to the respondent to pay the amount of salary for the period starting from 12th August, 1997 up to 31st March, 2001, the date of superannuation of the applicant.