OM PARKASH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of proceedings dated 12.12.2000 (Annexure P-11 and P-12), initiated by respondent No. 4, under Section 145 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has further prayed that respondent No. 2 and 3 be directed to arrest all the accused, who have been involved in FIR No. 138 dated 14.12.2000 (Annexure P-13), lodged under Section 295-A/506/452/34 IPC. The petitioner has further prayed that petitioner may be allowed to open the shop No. 193/3 situated in the back side of Loha Bazar, Mandi Gobindgarh.

(2.) SHRI G.S. Sandhawalia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. has been dropped by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amloh. He prayed that the petition qua quashing the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the prayer for quashing the proceedings dated 12.12.2000 under Section 145 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous.

(3.) IN view of the affidavit of Devinder Singh, SHO, Police Station, Mandi Gobindgarh, Sh. G.S. Dhanoa, Dy. Supdt. of Police and Shri R.S. Jangu, SDM, Amloh, no direction can be issued for the arrest of the respondents 5 and 6. If the petitioner has any grievance against the cancellation report, he has right to protest it as and when it is produced before the illaqua Magistrate and he has also alternative remedy to file a complaint before illaqua Magistrate as it has been laid down in Balabhadra Dash and another v. State of Orissa and others, 1991 Crl. L.J. 2457 as under :-