RAM BHAGAT Vs. NAVEEN KHURANIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAM Bhagat plaintiff had filed a suit for permanent injunction that he is a tenant in the shop-cum-godown, the premises in dispute, on payment of rent of Rs. 200/- since 1993. Defendant-landlord had agreed to execute rent note which was not executed and no rent receipt was issued. Injunction was sought against forcible dispossession from the tenanted premises. The suit was contested by the defendants. It was stated that Arjun Dev had taken the said shop on rent at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per month with effect from 16.4.1992 and he was running business there. The plaintiff had no connection with the premises.

(2.) THE learned trial Court after granting opportunity to the parties to lead evidence vide its judgment and decree dated 4.8.1997 dismissed the suit of the plaintiff with special costs of Rs. 500/-. The unsuccessful plaintiff preferred an appeal before the learned first Appellate Court. The learned Additional District Judge while affirming the finding of facts and the point of view in law taken by the learned trial Court held as under :-

(3.) PRESENT regular second appeal raised no question of law for consideration of the court. Dismissed in limine. Appeal dismissed.