KARTAR SINGH CHAWLA Vs. HAR KISHAN LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a tenant's revision petition and has been directed against the order dated 15th November, 1994 who dismissed the application of the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and consequently his appeal under Section 15 of the Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was also dismissed, as a result of which the order of the Rent Controller who ordered eviction of the tenant was upheld.

(2.) SOME facts can be noticed in the following manner :-

(3.) THE landlord gave ex parte evidence. He appeared as his own witness as P.W.1 and alleged that house-tax amounting to Rs. 26.25 was not paid by the tenant which was demanded vide registered notice Ex.P1. Relying upon the ex parte evidence, the learned Rent Controller vide order dated 28th May, 1994 allowed the ejectment petition and ordered the respondent to vacate the shop in dispute and hand over the actual physical possession to the landlord.